Here is a list I made on IMDB.com (Internet Movie Database) awhile ago. I want to use this as a checklist for reviews to write on this blog. I have already done some, but hope to get to all of them eventually.
The portion I wrote (which are all short summaries) for each film is surrounded in quotation marks and in bold faced italics.
Here is an old review I wrote on facebook back in 2010 for the movie Moonstruck.
Kinda short, but it’s fun to revisit….
Oh what a movie! This 1987 Best Picture Nominee is so true to life, you’ll swear it is a satire. But instead of satire, what you will see is a warm film, that realizes life’s little moments, whether sad or happy (and even the self-important “tragedies”) deserve to be looked upon as humorous. Several Oscar nominations were doled out to “Moonstruck” including wins for Cher (Best Actress), Olympia Dukakis (Best Supporting Actress), and John Patrick Shanley for his screenplay.
Loretta (Cher) is set to marry Johnny (Danny Aiello), but ends up falling for Ronny (Nicolas Cage), Johnny’s brother. Rose (Dukakis) is married to Cosmo (Vincent Gardenia, Best Supporting Actor nominee), Cosmo has a gal on the side. Johnny is at his mother’s death bed in Cicily, awaiting her death so he can marry Loretta. Johnny and Rony have not spoken in five years since a bread slicer accident…
All of this, plus many other great performances and stories, provides a unique cinematic experience, which is all the more amazing since the characters are so recognizable and normal.
It should be noted that this is one of Nicolas Cage’s best performances; he plays an eccentric baker, who with sincere honesty and persistence, is able to sweep Loretta off her feet. He is also the reason we get to see Cher take the greatest “Walk of Shame” of all time which makes us all yearn that one day we can be so lucky!
I must admit this is definitely one of my favorite films of all time. I say this in hopes it will make you watch it if you have not already. I truly think it is a film everyone needs to see for themselves. It holds such a profound meaning for me every single time I watch it, that I can only hope you’ll feel the same type of thing when you witness it for yourself. And once again, we can all strive to float down the street in the clothes we wore the night before as happily and obliviously as Cher does. ENJOY!!!!
The best procedural film on investigative journalism is All the President’s Men. All procedural films made after that one garner comparisons to it as All the President’s Men is the standard bearer for the genre. It is a risky thing to trust your ability as a filmmaker to put a movie out there that you expect moviegoers to enjoy which basically follows newspaper writers around watching them interview people and taking notes for two hours. If the subject matter is compelling enough for the audience then they will be more likely to enjoy the finer points of the film as they pertain to the procedural aspects. Tom McCarthy’s new film Spotlight not only keeps the audience’s attention, but is worthy of being compared to All the President’s Men as one of the best procedural films of all time.
Based on a true story, Spotlight begins in early July of 2001 at the Boston Globe when they brought on a new editor Marty Baron (Liev Schriber); Baron was a journeyman editor brought to the Boston Globe from his second stint at the Miami Herald. Schreiber portrays Baron as an earnest yet quietly driven man who tasks the Spotlight section of the paper to start investigating the alleged Catholic priests child molestation scandal and the church’s alleged coverup of the events. In order to eventually gain some tread with the likely findings of his reporters, Baron asks the Globe’s publisher Richard Gilman (Michael Countryman) if the paper may challenge a court ruling that ordered previous investigations to this matter sealed. Gilman gives his blessing and that is only the beginning of where we realize how bold of an investigation this will be given the city and the power the Catholic church holds over it.
The Spotlight team at the Globe consists of four members: Mike Rezendes (Mark Ruffalo); Sacha Pfeiffer (Rachel McAdams); Matt Carroll (Brian d’Arcy James); and the team leader, Walter “Robby” Robinson (Michael Keaton), all of whom are portrayed brilliantly by the actors who make us believe they are genuine investigative reporters. Robby (as played by Keaton) is a mellow guy who grew up in the Boston area and was educated in the Catholic school system that he has been tasked with investigating. He explains to his team what it is they need to do, and they set out to do it. Tom McCarthy directs the scenes between Robby and his (three) reporters with careful attention to the subtle construct of their hierarchy; Keaton holds the staff’s attention and commands respect without histrionics or waving an iron fist. McCarthy’s handling of these scenes is the most important aspect of this film, because this construct is the through line for the rest of the movie; it makes the reporters actions throughout the film all the more believable and defines them as important cogs in the investigation and not just ancillary characters added for symmetrical depth.
When the writers all begin their respective investigating on the assignment they do so with professionalism and a steadfast sense of duty like they would any story. McCarthy’s direction enriches Spotlight beyond (just) its procedural foundation. What the reporters find out is stuff we as viewers already know given that this is a story most of us have read/heard about before seeing the film. But what McCarthy does to implicate the viewers as a part of the scandal is nothing short of masterful and should net him a Best Director nomination – more on that in a moment.
It should be noted that given its subject matter, Spotlight is in no way an anti-religion film nor is it an anti-Catholic movie. If someone feels this way after viewing the film, I think they have missed the point entirely. Things of this nature are often (conveniently) given the out of sight out of mind brush off. This type of scandal is not the ordinary celebrity gossip type of thing that serves as a distraction to Americans. Sure it has the allure of a tabloid scandal, but it’s dealing with adults molesting children – bottom line! The only thing that gives it a gossipy fervor is that it is connected to the Catholic Church. McCarthy goes to great pains with his direction to point this out. He understands that the priests who committed these acts did so by using their standing as priests to molest children. As stated, McCarthy wants to make this clear; but what I believe to be the underlying theme of the film is that most Americans are guilty of standing blithely by while horrible things go on. We are more apt to hope that someone else (whose job it is) will get rid of this bad thing and pick up the pieces left behind. McCarthy is not blaming anyone for this necessarily, I believe he is imploring us to be more aware of our surroundings and to not be afraifd to take a stand where one is needed….
There is a scene that I feel serves as an allegorical moment to this theme:
During the investigation one day Robby and Mike (Keaton & Ruffalo) are walking down many hallways and stairs in the Boston Globe office building which eventually leads them to a dingy room in the basement where Matt (Brian d’Arcy James) is looking through many books for researching purposes. When the two men enter the room one of them exclaims, “What is that smell?!” Matt answers, “There’s a dead rat in the corner of the room.”
This is a small moment, yes, but it says a mouthful. These three men (and apparently any other people who have gone in to the room while the rat was decaying) have chosen to ignore the problem of the dead rat and put up with the smell for the short while they are in this room. Once they leave, they;ll no longer have to deal with the smell (or the decaying rodent’s body).
McCarthy is not saying these are bad men for ignoring the rat and perhaps leaving it to the janitor to clean up; he is simply giving a common example of man’s propensity to ignore with what they do not have to deal. In doing so, McCarthy is NOT comparing dead rats to priests molesting children. He is allowing for the audience to make the connection in a relatable way as to how someone can ignore something that is clearly a big problem and is happening in close proximity to where you work and live?
McCarthy performs a masterstroke of direction to answer this question, and also in establishing the church’s intoxicating power and influence in the city of Boston. In mostly every scene that takes place amidst the city, we see (different) beautiful church steeples towering over the background, which serves as a stark reminder of the Catholic church and its heavy influence throughout the community. He is not absolving anyone, mind you, but rather providing an artful reason as to how this scandal could’ve been ignored. This is done at several different locations. I feel not only is McCarthy trying to say it was difficult for people who knew about this scandal to say anything, but also the victims themselves.
One other element of Spotlight that also serves to establish an elephant in the room motif is the horrible events of 9/11. The beginning of the film shows subtitles indicating it is July of 2001. I can’t speak for anyone else, but the first thing I thought when I saw that is, how will the film handle 9/11? I know I already sound the like I am the president of the Tom McCarthy Fan Club (you should all see his film Win Win btw), but he handles these events with a grace and ease allowing for the events (as they pertain to the Spotlight staff) to act as a transition back to the investigation of the Catholic Church. McCarthy trusts the viewers’ collective memories of that day and its fallout to provide its own subnarrative to this section of the film. Needless to say 9/11 became the top reporting priority at The Boston Globe and therefore brought the current Spotlight investigation of the Church scandal to a halt. The Spotlight team stopped what they were doing to cover their portion of 9/11 as diligently as any other story. There is a scene where Mike has been sent to Florida to investigate the flight school where some of the 9/11 terrorists took flying lessons. What McCarthy does here to link the plot back to the Catholic Church investigation is so brilliant, yet so subtle, that if you blink you may miss it.
So we have a great (true) story, wonderful ensemble cast and all in all an entertaining film. What I think makes Spotlight special (once again) is the careful direction by Thomas McCarthy. He does a great job in establishing the hierarchy of the Boston Globe and also the Spotlight department. The performances are all great and the parts so well written that when we see one of the Globe writers maybe overstep their bounds (on the hierarchy), we understand how it makes sense or it is not inappropriate. I really enjoyed how we get to see all of the four main characters at one point or another treat this investigation with personal emotion. Yes, it is their job to do their unbiased investigating; so it is with great joy as a viewer watching them step out of their occupation for a moment to respectively take on the full magnitude of what it is they are actually trying to report. Spotlight reminds us to once in awhile allow for emotion to be our guide towards an earnest cause. This is the year’s best film….!!
This is less a review and more a fun explanation of why this is my favorite all time film.
This entry contains a timeline SPOILER.
If you don’t want to be spolied, please see film first….
For those who know me best, they can tell you without hesitation that No Country for Old Men is my favorite film of all time. Directed by the Coen Brothers (Joel & Ethan), No Country… came out in 2007 which incidently was overall a GREAT year for cinema. NCFOM won the Best Picture Oscar and was up against four incredibly good films in the same category (Juno, There Will Be Blood, Michael Clayton and Atonement). I mention this because I saw a lot of great films that year and it was as if NCFOM kept the ball rolling nicely. As I mentioned, I saw a TON of films that year, but I saw No Country for Old Men an alarming 15 times in the theater!! I guess one could say I was a bit obsessed; in fact, some of you did! But how could I not!? Everything in this film was quietly spectacular, and is one of the most perfectly executed films from page to screen I have ever seen!
From the foreboding opening narration by Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (Tommy Lee Jones) to the menacing bounty hunter (or whatever he was) Anton Chigurh (Best Supporting Actor, Javier Bardem) to the everyman Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) trying to secure his future with drug money that was not his, this film is rich with character, scenery and story.
Let’s get back to the narration for a moment: Sheriff Bell tells us about himself and his job. He brings up other Sheriffs who came before him including his father (“…me and him was sherrifs at the same time.”). He talks about the importance of history and how in order to judge yourself you must first compare yourself to the “ol’timers.” This narration sets up the entire film, parenthetically laying out the plot for us, but also showing us Ed Tom is a man who has the capacity to be consumed by guilt.
The unflinching performance delivered by Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh is one for the ages! Patiently making his way to find Moss and the money; always prepared for anything, knowing that the path he takes will lead him to where he needs to go because that is what fate has in store (“CALL IT!”). He also has a disdain for the weak willed. He feels humans (and birds apparently) are born of free will and that anything is possible, so when he sees a living thing not forcing its will upon its potential, let’s just say he may want to kill it….
All of this is set to extraordinary cinematography by veteran Roger Deakins, a long time collaborator with the Coen Brothers. His work on the film offers a bleak subnarrative to the cat and mouse arc, intimating that all the people in this world are in this mess together.
A lot of people share the opinion that No Country… is a wonderfully suspenseful film that keeps you on the edge of your seat, and they really enjoyed it…except for the ending. Now, those people are correct about everything save for the part about the ending. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, let’s just assume they all experienced mental paralysis during the end where Tommy Lee Jones explains the two dreams he had the night before.
I always get a chuckle out of people saying that they hated this ending! Not to wax rhetorically about it, but if you did not like this ending, what conclusion would you have rather seen? The opening narration sets up the entire film for the viewer, and Ed Tom’s dreams answer a lot of questions Ed Tom has about himself. I admit: The first time I saw it, I was not ready for the ending. I did not pay as much attention to what Ed Tom was saying as I should have, so when the credits started rolling I wanted to run my head in to a wall! I thought to myself, “Oh no! What have I done!?” Now having seen the film 20 times, I can recite the ending out loud, so….
Two days later my best friend Mike (I call him Wheats – long story) was in town from Los Angeles. Wheats is a big reason I like cinema as much as I do. He also had already seen NCFOM a week earlier, but due to an unfortunate movie theater bathroom incident, he missed a portion of the film. We both had unfinished business with this movie that we both had been looking forward to seeing (together) for so so long!
So on a Sunday in early November of 2007, Wheats and I headed to the Main Art Theater in Royal Oak, Michigan to finally watch this film with focused eyes, determined to soak it all in with ZERO distractions! Well my friends, I am happy to report this was the very BEST film going experience of my life! We both paid attention to every second of the film (especially the ending) and this time as I listened to Ed Tom discuss his dreams I realized the importance of what he was saying and it was downright enthralling! As Wheats and I exited through the theater doors I felt like I was floating (not walking) and as I looked straight ahead waliking side by side with Mike I said with great confidence, “Wheats, that is the best film I have ever seen in my life…..”
Then I was off and running! Like I said, I saw the film 13 more times in the theater alone! Some of those times were normal enough; I would go with family & friends who I thought would like it. Other times, however, were less normal; I’d buy tickets to other movies playing at the Main Art and fully intended on seeing them, but as I was about to pass the double doors to the theater playing No Country… I found myself compelled to go in and watch it again…so I did!
I think what compelled me to see it so much and so often is that it showed characters who lifted themselves to high places without the fear of consequences. Javier Bardem’s character certainly displayed this characterisric the most, so I do understand that I am appreciaitng the actions of cinematic murderer, please don’t think I do not.
There are plenty of themes to be discussed about this film and believe me I will do further entries about these themes. But for now I thought it necessary to simply write about my favorite film of all time and share little anecdotes regarding my obsession for it.
I would love to discuss this with y’all, so please, if there are any questions you have about No Country for Old Men, post them in the comments section and I will address them.
More to come later…FRIENDO!
As I begin writing this review for The Big Short, I am somehow reminded of the brilliant and darkly comedic satire American Psycho (2000). The two films share very little in common except Christian Bale is in both and both have to do with Wall Street. The Big Short is based on a true story whereas American Psycho is pure imagination and strictly speaking a more direct satire. The reason I am comparing these two films is because I think they can be considered sister films (or at least first cousins). Without spoiling ‘Psycho for you, I will say that film uses fantasy and violence to display the effect greed and one’s concern with placement on the snobbery hierarchy (in the United States) can have on the psyche; The Big Short is what actually happens to the USA if American Psycho‘s fantasies take on a real life form.
But let’s talk about The Big Short…..
Adam McKay’s The Big Short is the true story of the housing market bubble bursting in 2008 and how a handful of Wall Street outsiders predicted it and were able to make a LOT of money because of it. The way McKay handles this material is risky and bold, but the result is very entertaining and one of the best films of 2015!
I will not explain the finer details of the plot; part of the many joys of this film is the way McKay has his characters explain it to the audience. Not only is he treating the subject matter as satire, but McKay is also having a little fun with the based on a true story theme, and dare I say satirizing the genre as well.
McKay understands that this material is difficult to understand by the average film going American, so he uses brilliant meta moments to (not) dumb-it-down, but make it easier for the viewer to understand. Here’s an example:
McKay implies that the country uses pop culture and celebrity to distract the public from the actual evil that goes on from time to time. He employs the same tactic, but instead utilizes it to help explain the difficult financial terms and investment strategies. In one example he has Ryan Gosling’s character breaking the fourth wall** telling the audience, “Now to help you understand, here is Margot Robbie drinking Champagne in a bubble bath explaining it to you…” And then, yes, the gorgeous Margot Robbie also breaks the fourth wall from a bubble bath and directly explains to us viewers whatever the film’s plot is dealing with at that moment! This method is used a few other times in the film with popular celebrities spanning many disciplines.
In addition to not delving too far in to the plot, I will also not use character’s names in this review, there are too many to count. I will say that the cast is remarkable and none of them miss a beat. Steve Carell’s character is my favorite of the film. He moves through the film so smoothly with a steadfast ambition to get things done the way he wants to do them. Just when you think he is getting in his own way with his manic tics, you realize this behavior is what will also get him out of his own way. More than that, though, his character is (I believe) supposed to be an agent of the layperson – the viewer – us…. The events depicted in this film and some of the people portrayed who are partly responsible for this colossal financial collapse are reprehensible greedy A-HOLES! Easy for me to say, but Carell’s character is a person with a strong and thoughtful understanding of this financial crisis, so when we the viewer see his character showing disgust for these bad people, we feel it’s okay for us to feel that way too.
In addition to Carell we get an almost unrecognizable Brad Pitt who in a moment at a casino interrupts his two partners’ celebration to remind them of what their financial gain is built upon: Other American’s misfortune. As I mentioned, Ryan Gosling plays a cocky investor who with great command breaks the fourth wall from time to time to explain to the viewer how exactly this is all working. Marissa Tomei shows up briefly as Carell’s wife. Although it’s a small role, I believe McKay employed her celebrity and competence to let the viewers understand she is an important support to Carell’s character. Christian Bale plays an M.D. turned financial adviser who is the first to recognize the downward trend of the housing market. I have come to expect nothing short of greatness from Bale and he does not disappoint here. Great minor supporting performances by all help to make this a very enjoyable film
I mentioned earlier how I feel McKay is not only treating this material as satire, but also satirizing the true story genre. There are a couple of moments where I feel this is clearly indicated, but I will share with you the biggest example:
A lot has been made in recent years about the liberties films take with subject matter that is based on a true story. People are complaining that the events as they are laid out in these films are not exactly how they went down in real life. I say to those people that you need to watch this medium called film a little more closely to find the finer details that imply liberties are being taken, but I digress….
McKay does something really fun and funny in The Big Short to hopefully satisfy these people who want true stories to be truer.
I don’t want to spoil the fun, so I’ll explain just enough for you to recognize when it happens:
Two of his characters are trying to move up the financial totem pole and try to get a meeting with a big bank. The meeting takes place in the lobby of a large office building in New York (as their current status did not warrant an invitation past the lobby). After being rejected, there is some very deliberate dialogue explaining how often they get rejected and by how many firms. Then they find something that just happens to be on the table in the lobby that turns them on to a new project. That’s when one of the guys breaks the fourth wall to explain how it really happened in real life! It plays as a funny moment, but mainly calls attention to how boring this passage of the film would’ve been had they shown the real way it occurred. It’s not cutting corners, it’s efficiency….!
I mention a lot of the different techniques McKay uses in this film to move the material along. Most of them employ humor, which makes a lot of sense given McKay’s filmography (Anchorman, Step Brothers http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0570912/?ref_=ttfc_fc_wr2#director). Some may argue that McKay was the wrong choice for The Big Short. These people may think he copped out and resorted to humor because that’s all he can do. Firstly I’d respond to those people by saying, SO WHAT? But secondly I’d politely tell those people they are wrong. The humor serves as a buffer to this material. We are watching a film that has to do with millions of people losing their jobs and retirement money and their homes because of the greed of other Americans. The humor makes this subject matter a little more sugary and thus easier to swallow. Not all of the scenes are funny; some are downright sad, but given the balance the humorous and satirical parts provide, this a film that is not only enjoyable, but also informative.
I think I have made it clear to you that I am no financial guru by any stretch of the imagination. I like films like this that are informatively artful. I mentioned American Psycho; I wonder if director Mary Harron knew what was on the horizon at Wall Street when she made it. I wonder if Adam McKay revisited American Psycho before he made The Big Short. It doesn’t really matter. What matters is we are living in a country that stands on the credo of hard work and turns right around and devalues it. It does so with the motivation of greed and the idea that if I have more than you, I am simply better than you. Patrick Bateman in American Psycho knew this, but hated himself for it. The real life people portrayed in The Big Short who are responsible for the financial mess knew it too, but they only hated poor people and immigrants. Lofty accusations by me, maybe, but it’s not a new story. The almighty dollar is a big motivation for Americans and gets incorrectly equated to realizing dreams. If an underlying lesson can be taken from The Big Short, I think it is this: We mustn’t boil things down to buzzwords. We mustn’t bastardize our dreams to a dollar sign. Be earnest in your fight for survival and our country’s worth will rise….
This is one of the most important films of the decade….!!
** Breaking the fourth wall –
Speaking directly to, otherwise acknowledging or doing something to the audience through this imaginary wall – or, in film and television, through a camera – is known as “breaking the fourth wall“.
Here we go again, right!? Another Rocky movie! This time around (that’s the seventh time) it is a bit different. The most obvious difference being the title, Creed. This is the first time in the series where the word ‘Rocky’ is not in the title; this is the first time Sylvester Stallone has not written an entry to the series; and this is also the first time someone named John G. Avildsen or Sylvester Stallone did not direct an entry. What all that really proves or means, I do not know, but what I do know is that Creed is the best film in the series since Rocky (1976) which won the Best Picture Oscar and also earned Stallone a Best Actor nomination (and Best Original Screenplay), and if the universe is fair, he will receive a Best Supporting Actor nomination for this surprising gem which is one of the year’s best films!
Although Creed is a continuation of the Rocky mythology, Rocky Balboa is not the focal point of the story. The main character instead is Adonis Johnson, the illegitimate son of Apollo Creed, who was born after Apollo died in the ring (see Rocky IV). Adonis is young foster child when we first meet him, and is adopted by Apollo’s widow Mary Ann Creed out of an orphanage, who treats Adonis as if he is her son. Adonis is raised by Mary Ann in Los Angeles (the city where Apollo fought out of) in a beautiful home and grows up in to an intelligent upstanding man. By night we see him travel to Mexico taking part (and dominating) in non sanctioned boxing matches, and by day we see Adonis donned in a pressed shirt and tie in a nice office, turning down a promotion by resigning so he can chase his dream of being a boxer.
Adonis’ last name Johnson is his late (biological) mother’s name which he keeps maybe out of respect, but also because he wants to make a name for himself in the boxing world without being known as Apollo Creed’s son. So without his father’s name or his mother Mary Ann’s blessing, Adonis heads to Philadelphia to further distance himself from Apollo’s legacy and to seek out Rocky Balboa for training.
After he gets settled in to his new city, Adonis does indeed seek out Rocky at his tucked away restaurant on a small Philadelphia street. This is an important scene to the film because not only does it begin to establish the relationship on which the film’s plot will forge, but it also shows the subtle brash side of Adonis that is needed to complement a great fighter’s boxing ability. After a couple scenes where the Italian Stallion gives him the brush off, Rocky begins to slowly acclimate to the role of Adonis’ trainer. These scenes are handled with great care by director Ryan Coogler; he is in no rush to get to the fight scenes or training montages and instead allows for Rocky and Adonis’ relationship to blossom organically so that the audience may see and understand the love they have for one another and not love based on archetypal legend, which a lesser film may’ve done.
Coogler handles every scene with originality but also ties this new story to careful homage of yesteryear Rocky films: We hear mention of Paulie, Mick and Apollo; Rocky has Adonis chase a chicken; we get to see Phildelphia (which is a sort of character in this series); of course Adrian is etched in to the fabric of Rocky’s persona. My favorite of the homages is when Adonis is closing in on the last days of training for the film’s big fight and he is running through the streets of Philly with an alternative version of the original Rocky score. I assure you your goosebumps will have goosebumps when you watch this scene!!
Michael B. Jordan has been showing up in a lot of different kinds of movies these recent years including director Ryan Coogler’s Fruitvale Station (which I have yet to see). In Creed he proves he can give a sharp dramatic turn while carrying the weight of a tremendous physical performance as well. I mentioned Stallone’s performance as being an Oscar worthy one and I have my fingers crossed this will happen. The Oscars are meant for discussion and fun and it would be SUPER fun to talk about Stallone earning a nomination for reprising the role that shot him to super stardom back in the mid 70s! Sure he is the same ol’ punchy (now former) boxer we have come to know and love, but this time around we get to see a side of him that is sweeter, and when we see his Rocky character face some personal adversity, it is with heartfelt eyes we watch him have to fight something (for once) without using his fists – this is by far one of the best performances of the year!***
We get to see Adonis compete in two (sanctioned) fights. It is strange to see Rocky in the corner for both of them, but we really enjoy watching Adonis do his thing in the squared circle this time around. One of the reasons for this is that the fight scenes are expertly filmed! One of the rounds I swear was shot as one continuous take and in real time. I honestly felt like I was getting hit by some of the right hooks! Sure some of the punches would kill someone in real life, but filmgoers are supposed to suspend disbelief which is easier to do when the film is a well made one… like this one!
All in all Creed is a modern day sports film masterpiece! It contains all of our favorite things we have come to expect in a sports movie and done with such care by Coogler that viewers will celebrate the cliches through which they would otherwise groan! Instead of groaning, I found myself (along with the rest of the theater) fist pumping and cheering during the fights and being moved by the actions and kind words of the characters. Should this be the last Rocky film, It is the perfect epitaph for this legendary series….
***Rocky gives a toast before a casual dinner in his dining room to Adonis and his girlfriend. The words are so simple and heartfelt and Stallone delivers them with such ease and grace, that if there is justice in the world, Stallone will earn that Oscar nomination!
What a wondrously wonderful film! From the opening moments where we hear the unmistakeable sound of a needle being placed on a vinyl record set to the different film studios’ logos, to the opening credits being hand written (and also erased at times) with a pencil, we know we are in for a fun film watching experience. And oh, how fun indeed! Besides the fantastic soundtrack from the rock n roll era of the 70s, writer director Cameron Crowe takes us on this semi-autobiographical adventure, where a boy poses as a man to experience life through rock n roll! Displaying an envious romp through a concert tour with and up and coming (ficticious) band, Almost Famous shows us how rewarding life can be if you grab it by the balls, but also the virtue of being shamelessly intelligent in a world that tells you that it ain’t cool to be that way! This is one of the best films of all time….!!
We first meet our young hero William Miller when he is just 11 years old (although he thinks he is 12 – long story). He lives with his over protective yet loving mother (Frances McDormand) and rebellious older sister Anita (Zooey Deschanel) in sunny San Diego, California. Mom is a nonconformist who is raising her children to think for themselves, so long as they abide by her rules which include celebrating Christmas on a day in September, no rock n roll music and NO DRUGS! When Anita can no longer handle living at home (just after she turns 18) she packs up and leaves with her boyfriend to become a flight attendant, and does so quite ceremoniously to the sounds of Simon and Garfunkel! Before she departs, she informs William to look under his bed where he finds an emergency style tote of rock n roll records with handy notes advising William as to the proper way to listen to each record!
Cut to four years later and we meet the 15 year old William (Patrick Fugit) who looks like a typical 1970s teenager with the scruffy hair and long pants. There is nothing typical about our hero, so discovers famous rock n roll critic for Creem Magazine, Lester Bangs (Phillip Seymour Hoffman). Through the persistence of sending him his articles from the high school newspaper, William gets to meet Bangs and have a sit down with him to learn the ins-and-outs of rock journalism including the virtue of being unmerciful and honest and no matter what happens, DO NOT MAKE FRIENDS WITH THE ROCKSTARS! In this brilliant scene, William is given an assignment by Bangs to write 1,000 words on Black Sabbath after going to their concert that night.
Not having a ticket, William is forced to find a clever way in to the concert via backstage; after a couple of failed attempts, he finally makes it in, and it is in that moment the real WIlliam Miller is born!! As he enters the bowels of the arena, a look of gracious awe falls about his face as if he knows he is exactly where he needs to be at that moment in his life – we should all feel so lucky! It is here where he meets the world: An up and coming band called Stillwater, many rock clingers and many groupies (excuse me, Band-Aids), including the world renown and beautifully exotic (Miss) Penny Lane (Kate Hudson).
Stillwater is comprised of four total members, but mostly the world is interested in lead guitarist Russell Hammond (Billy Crudup). William makes fast friends with Penny and despite Lester Bangs’ advice, William is seemingly infatuated with Russell. After the show William and Penny make plans to go see Stillwater play in Los Angeles, which makes William as excited as any teenage boy would be making plans with a beautiful young lady!
Despite learning in LA that Russell and Penny Lane are some sort of an item, the trip is very rewarding for William and it leads to Rolling Stone Magazine hiring him to travel with Stillwater on their tour across the United States. The man who hires William is Ben Fong-Torres who mistakes William for a fully grown well adjusted adult, maybe due to his writing ability and the way he pitches his ideas to him. Whatever the reason, William finds himself having to convince his overprotective mother to let him go on tour with the band! Not for nothing, but God bless actors like Frances McDormand who know just the right amount of spice to add to a role that may have otherwise been a cliche. The scene where she grants permission is short and to the point and the way in which McDormand delivers the lines is priceless – good on ya Frances!
So we find our hero travelling across the country trying to write this article for Rolling Stone (sometimes on napkins in a bathtub) about the up and coming band (from Troy Michigan) Stillwater! He learns lesson after lesson and DEFINITELY becomes friends with the band! He calls Lester Bangs at all hours of the night seeking advice as he has trouble writing his article. These scenes between Bangs and William on the phone are an important piece to the film. Most of the tour scenes are super fun to watch and are happening at a breakneck frenetic pace, and the meetings between William and Bangs help provide a calm center in the rock n roll storm and to the film! One of the calls comes after the tour and the conversation is filled with beautiful honesty and artful sweetness where Bangs explains the integrity it takes to be a great writer – judicious and prudent…!!
Every film lover DESERVES to see this incredible film! Not only is the plot exciting and inspiring, but the music is great complementing each scene/moment perfectly!** Crowe at the helm is on fire directing his script giving us all interesting characters to watch do their thing! From the Rolling Stone execs to the groupies on tour, we are constantly entertained by all of them throughout the film. Even at the end where the film gets wrapped up in a nice little bow, it is done so with such charm and with a really cool and unique set up, that we don’t mind. Crowe trusts the audience to trust that his characters are intelligent to realize life doesn’t always have a happy ending – just this moment of this character’s life does. It takes some serious confidence as a filmmaker to do this, and Mr. Crowe, we are happy that you did…..
** Elton John’s song Tiny Dancer is set to a sort of crossroads moment of the film and is perceived by many as one of the best uses of a song in a movie ever.
To speak of the film Room strictly from a plot standpoint would be a terrible injustice to the efforts of the filmmakers involved in delivering this bold masterpiece to the screen. In the midst of the the film’s unconvention, we find a symmetry that emboldens our care for the main players (in the film) and also provides an emotional transition from scene to scene so that we may be witness to these people’s extraordinary journey to “normalcy.” This is one of the year’s best films!
I once again hesitate to offer a plot description for Room as I feel going in blindly will be a better filmgoing experience for everyone. That being said, I can tell you this is a powerful film containing subject matter that is not easily digestable. You will feel uncomfortably at times, but I promise if you stick with our heroes of the film, you will be a satisfied filmgoer.
The director Lenny Abrahamson wisely holds back (initially) on the broader world of our two heroes (Ma & Jack) to let us discover for ourselves the true horror of their lives (moreso for Ma). And I don’t know how much Abrahamson had to do with it, but this is one of the very best performances by a child in cinema history, and Jacob Tremblay should earn an Oscar Nomination for his performance. Brie Larson as Ma is also a shoo-in for a Best Actress nomination.
And that’s all for now….
I want you to see this as uninformed as possible.
In summation: Room is a must see! Please don’t be afraid to allow your emotions to become your guide and follow them to the conclusion. Understand this is not an entertaining film per se and that you will have to immerse yourself in to the film’s unconventional waters in order to enjoy the experience. If you can do that, you will be seeing one of the decade’s best films….!!
I seem to have noticed over the years that when a person has a heightened interest in something that their peers will always apologize for merely dabbling in to the same arena. It’s as if your friends feel compelled to fall on the sword of amateurism deeming you the foremost expert of a particular field. Here’s an example: I love movies! My friends know this. Once in awhile someone who does not watch movies as much as I wishes to tell me about a light comedy they just saw and they really liked it. I’d say nine times out of ten that person will preface their story with, “I know you may consider this to be a dumb movie,” or, “I am no expert like you.”
While I appreciate the sentiment, I assure you I AM NO EXPERT! I was not educated in the art of cinema or filmmaking; I cannot wax intelligently about all of the different eras or movements of cinema; I am not 100% fluent in filmese; and I am certainly not above seeing a light comedy and enjoying it!!
All that being said, I can promise you the following: I will always try my best to get aligned with what (I think) the director is trying to convey. It is my opinion that what makes a movie or film good is if it accomplishes what it set out to do! But forget about that! Some times there are movies we just can’t help but love regardless of their artistic merit (or lack thereof). When seeing a film, I make a habit of applying the philosophy of my good friend Justin Bodary:
A man goes to a theater and sees a film, and forms his own opinion….
If I could, I would see every film ever made and (like I do now) I will always try to find the good qualities it possesses. I feel it is easier to be objective about a film when you try to see it through the director’s eyes.
SO….. with all that in mind, let’s talk about our favorite shitty flicks!
Best of the Best (1989) – This putrid litte gem of a Karate/Taekwondo movie is so wonderful because it combines those familiar sports film cliches we all love so much: Overcoming an old injury; black sheep team member changes attitude at right time; stubborn coach who is humbled through reason and emotion; bar fight scene displaying our heroes’ karate moves*; etc. etc. etc. etc. etc ETC……!!!
Set to a requisite crappy 80’s sondtrack, Best of the Best follows the National United States Taekwondo team all the way from tryouts to the big tournament in Korea against the Korean National Team who are far superior fighters than Team USA.
Along the way we see the aforementioned cliches and some really shotty subplots! For all of it flaws, the movie does actually contain four previous Oscar nominees: James Earl Jones, Eric Roberts, Sally Kirkland and Louise Fletcher who actually is an Oscar winner. Not that this really matters, but I feel it provides this weird and funny sort of symmetry to the whole thing!
But listen y’all, I LOVE THIS MOVIE! My friends and I use to rent it every weekend from Videomax! We watched it so often that we knew at which points in the movie where all the VHS glitches and scratches would show up! I know every line from the end speech that the bad ass Korean fighter (Dae Han) gives to the bad ass USA fighter (Tommy Lee – I swear to God!) and I even can do the Eric Roberts’ lines with his exact voice (COACH! HE”S GONNA KILL ‘EM!!)!!
And that’s the point – why be a film snob? Recognize this movie for exactly what it is: A martial arts vehicle! I imagine the producers of the film said something like this: “Throw some shitty dialogue together; let’s give the Asian guy a sad backstory and GOD DAMN IT can someone PLEASE get me Eric Roberts on the phone – we need him for the bar fight scene???!!!!”
So in that sense, the movie is a success! We get to suffer through these contrivances with some good looking actors, James Earl Jones’ awesome voice and Sally Kirkland’s legs! Oh, and don’t forget about the actual tournament: Some really kick ass martial arts on display! And as an added bonus, former NFL wide receiver for the Minnesota Vikings and former host of NBA’s ‘Inside Stuff’ Ahmad Rashad does the play-by-play commentating for the Taekwondo tournament scenes! Versatile guy, eh?!
This will not be the last entry I do about my favorite shitty flicks. This entry serves as an introduction of who I am as a film lover and entusiast and to have a little fun with it.
I would love to hear what some of your favorite movies are and if you think they fall under the category of shitty flicks.
See ya soon….
*This bar fight scene is so useless to the rest of the film, that I honestly think they shot it and kept it in the movie so its runtime would be over 90 minutes!